These two are often treated as two ways of doing the same thing. In fact they solve problems along two different axes — they don't conflict, and neither can replace the other.
One-line answer
Answer
Our takeIt's not either-or: multiple agents (subagents) solve width within a single task — side quests like searching, testing, and research run in parallel in separate contexts, bringing only summaries back to the main conversation; multiple sessions solve length across time — each independent piece of work gets its own nameable, resumable session. Ask "is this a side branch of my current task, or a separate piece of work?" and the answer falls out.
Steps
- Classify the work first.OfficialThe criterion for a subagent: a side task would flood the main conversation with search results, logs, or file contents you'll never reference again — so it does the work in its own context window and returns only a summary. Conversely, if it's a separate piece of work unrelated to what you're doing now, it deserves its own session.
- For width within one task, use subagents.Just say it in the conversation: "use subagents to research the auth, database, and API modules in parallel".OfficialSince v2.1.198 subagents run in the background by default, so the main conversation isn't blocked; but note that each subagent's result eventually flows back into the main conversation — spawn too many, each returning a long report, and they crowd out your context all the same.
- For multiple tasks across time, use multiple sessions.OfficialA session is a conversation bound to a project directory and persisted to disk: name it at startup with
claude -n auth-refactor, then resume it by name withclaude --resume auth-refactor; inside a session,/branchcopies the current conversation to try another path while leaving the original untouched. For the full session-management playbook, see D6 · Session management. - Multiple sessions editing the same repo will step on each other's files — the fix is one worktree per session; see Worktrees: keep parallel sessions out of each other's way.
- At larger scale, upgrade by asking "who coordinates".OfficialThe docs give selection criteria for four parallelism modes:
Mode Who coordinates When to use it Subagents Claude dispatches and collects results within one conversation Side tasks would flood the main conversation Agent view ( claude agents)You toss independent tasks into the background and check status later Several unrelated things in flight at once (research preview) Agent teams A lead agent splits work, assigns it, and tracks progress You want Claude itself to coordinate a group of workers (experimental, off by default) Dynamic workflows A script holds the plan and runs dozens or hundreds of subagents Repo-wide audits, large migrations — work beyond what one conversation can coordinate - Our own experiment backs this up.Our takeWe ran a controlled experiment with 27 agents and reached the same conclusion: multiple agents manage width within one task, multiple sessions manage length across time and total context, and the two axes are orthogonal; what actually decides whether parallel development succeeds is having an interface contract everyone follows. Full write-up: Multiple sessions or multiple agents? I ran 27 agents to find out.
- Cost note.OfficialRunning several sessions or subagents at once multiplies token consumption, and it all counts toward your plan's usage and rate limits.
Copy-paste prompt
I have these things on my plate:
1. <task A>
2. <task B>
3. <task C>
Classify them first — don't start working yet:
- Which are side branches of the same task that can run in parallel?
Handle those yourself with background subagents; each subagent should
return only its conclusions and a list of changes, not its working
output;
- Which are independent tasks? List those back to me and I'll open a
separate session for each with claude -n <name>.
Show me the classification for confirmation first; once I confirm,
execute only the parts that belong in this session.
Sources & last verified
- OfficialManage sessions, fetched 2026-08-05.
- OfficialCreate custom subagents, fetched 2026-08-05.
- OfficialRun agents in parallel, fetched 2026-08-05.
- Our takeMultiple sessions or multiple agents? I ran 27 agents to find out, our long-form experiment write-up, verified 2026-08-05.
- Last verified: 2026-08-05 · volatility:high (agent view and agent teams are both preview/experimental features; behavior changes across versions).